Philosophy

To Name or Not to Name

“Srila Prabhupada instructed both to avoid naming philosophical adverseries and charlatans, and also to openly name and attack certain cheaters. Which of these approaches to follow poses a dilemma. On the one hand, not naming them helps to keep the discussion more philosophically focused, which is actually the point, since devotees have no personal contention with anyone but wish to expose everything that is misleading. By keeping a philosophical focus, devotees’ rebuffs become templates that can be applied in the future, regardless of who the forthcoming propounders of similar errors may be. On the other hand, by naming persons whose position we wish to assail, the immediate issue comes unmistakably into focus (persons and issues being inextricably connected) and tends to generate significantly greater interest than the more discreet approach. However, naming of persons is usually taken as a personal attack, which in contemporary culture is considered reprehensible and hence, the actual issue commonly declines into emotional altercations on the platform of “friends and enemies,” rather than consisting of constructive philosophical exchanges.

Still, followers of Srila Prabhupada should be known to oppose all kinds of bogus persons and ideas-which inevitably means that we sometimes directly engage or name them. Many uninformed people consider devotees of Krsna to be similar to “other Indian groups” but it is deplorable that Vaishnavas be lumped in with impersonalists and other sundry charlatans. So devotees should make the difference known by loudly broadcasting it. However, it is best not to publicly name persons who are widely respected if doing so is likely to create popular outrage against devotees to the extent that almost everyone becomes unwilling to hear our message. It also is generally inadvisable to overtly name powerful persons who could create serious difficulties for devotees.

On the whole, devotees should be cautious about openly criticizing prominent persons, but if they do so, they should not simply slang others but should present cogent arguments to demonstrate that those personalities deserve to be attacked.”
———————————————
Book by HH Bhakti Vikasa Swami, “On Speaking Strongly in Srila Prabhupada’s Service”, Chapter:’ To Name or Not to Name’, Page 209-210.

Share:

Follow us

Padmanayana Krsna Dasa

Recent Posts

The Jolly Swami – Wit and Wisdom from Sridhar Swami by Adbhuta Hari Dasa

New Release: The Jolly Swami – Wit and Wisdom from Sridhar SwamiWe are pleased to…

5 days ago

Autobiography of a Bhakti Yogi by John Berg Yogindravandana Dasa

New Release: Autobiography of a Bhakti YogiWe are pleased to announce the release of Autobiography…

5 days ago

Female Dīkṣā-Gurus: Ensuring the unity of ISKCON on doctrinal matters

Female Dīkṣā-Gurus: Ensuring the unity of ISKCON on doctrinal mattersBy Śrīdhara Śrīnivāsa dāsaḥAn important goal…

5 days ago

Is the SAC’s 2005 paper in line with guru, sādhu and śāstra?

Is the SAC’s 2005 paper in line with guru, sādhu and śāstra?By Kṛṣṇa Kīrti dāsaḥIn…

5 days ago

The Question of Female Dīkṣā-Gurus in ISKCON

The Question of Female Dīkṣā-Gurus in ISKCONBy Basu Ghoṣa dāsaḥ (ACBSP)How did the concept of…

5 days ago

Is not receiving the Brahma-gāyatrī the higher standard for women?

Is not receiving the Brahma-gāyatrī the higher standard for women?By Bhakta ŚobhitāṃśuDecember 29, 2025Posted inThe Scriptural…

5 days ago